Editorial Policies

Focus and Scope

Aim and Scope

AGRIN provides facilities for publishing articles or quality papers in the form of research results in various aspects of agriculture and agricultural commodities widely including ; agronomy, agroecology, plant breeding, horticulture, soil science, plant protection, agribusiness, agroforestry, food science and technology , agricultural techniques, agricultural innovations, agricultural models and agricultural biotechnology. This journal is published twice a year, ie the April and October. The Agrin Journal invites researchers, academics and intellectuals to contribute critical writing and contribute to the development of agricultural science.

Tujuan dan Ruang Lingkup

AGRIN menyediakan fasilitas untuk penerbitan artikel atau makalah berkualitas dalam bentuk hasil penelitian dalam berbagai aspek lingkup pertanian dan komoditas pertanian secara luas antara lain bidang agronomi, agroekologi, pemuliaan tanaman, hortikultura, ilmu tanah, ilmu perlindungan tanaman, agribisnis, agroforestry, ilmu dan teknologi pangan, teknik pertanian, inovasi pertanian, model pertanian dan bioteknologi pertanian. Jurnal ini terbit dua kali dalam satu tahun, yakni edisi bulan April dan Oktober. Jurnal Agrin mengundang peneliti, akademisi dan intelektual untuk menyumbang tulisan yang kritis dan berkontribusi pada pengembangan ilmu pertanian.


Section Policies


Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Peer Review Process

The research article submitted to this online journal will be peer-reviewed at least 2 (two) reviewers. The accepted research articles will be available online following the journal peer-reviewing process. Language used in this journal is English or Indonesia.

Peer review is designed to assess the validity, quality and often the originality of articles for publication. Its ultimate purpose is to maintain the integrity of science by filtering out invalid or poor quality articles.

From a publisher’s perspective, peer review functions as a filter for content, directing better quality articles to better quality journals and so creating journal brands.

Running articles through the process of peer review adds value to them. For this reason publishers need to make sure that peer review is robust.

Editor Feedback

"Pointing out the specifics about flaws in the paper’s structure is paramount. Are methods valid, is data clearly presented, and are conclusions supported by data?” (Editor feedback)

“If an editor can read your comments and understand clearly the basis for your recommendation, then you have written a helpful review.” (Editor feedback)

Peer Review at Its Best

What peer review does best is improve the quality of published papers by motivating authors to submit good quality work – and helping to improve that work through the peer review process. 

In fact, 90% of researchers feel that peer review improves the quality of their published paper (University of Tennessee and CIBER Research Ltd, 2013).


Open Access Policy

This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.